My name is Maria Priestley and this post is based on research that was done as part of my undergraduate degree in Biological Anthropology at the University of Durham. All data were collected during November 2013 and used for nonprofit educational purposes. A published version of the findings can be found in PLoS One journal.
We
all have a vague idea of the reasons why content gets rated
positively or negatively on reddit, but it's always nice to get
empirical evidence to explore these things. I attempted to do this
using an online questionnaire consisting of two parts. Redditors were
first asked to vote on a selection of 15 comments and to write brief
explanations for these decisions. All explanations were then read and
recurring reasons for upvotes and downvotes were identified. The
second part of the survey had 29 questions asking participants to
rate the importance of different content traits as influences on
voting (e.g. content sounding intelligent, following reddit rules,
expressing agreeable opinions...). These ratings underwent
statistical analyses to group correlated traits into a smaller number
of broad influences, which were then examined against variables like
age, gender and reddit membership duration. The participant sample
consisted of 489 adults recruited mainly from /r/TheoryOfReddit,
/r/Anthropology and /r/SampleSize. I will summarise the main findings
here, but there is a second instalment here containing full details
on the comment voting results.
The
chart below shows the average importance of different influences on
upvotes and downvotes as reported by the participants.
We can see that wishing
content to be seen by others was rated as the most important
influence in upvotes. The other influences appear less important, but
they give a better idea of the specific content traits that may
contribute to upvotes and downvotes.
Informational skill
was an influence that covered questions on the interestingness and
intellectual value of content, so its high importance is
understandable. When voting on comments, participants often explained
their decisions with references to how interesting the comment was,
as seen in the example below.
Common reasons for
voting on other comments also included references to quality of
writing and sources.
These results were interpreted in an evolutionary context as part of my undergraduate anthropology thesis. With regard to
the high importance of informational value in voting, I suggested
that upvotes could be a way of showing deference to people who are
deemed to possess informational skill. This kind of tendency may have
helped our ancestors to secure access to skilful individuals who
possessed valuable information.
Relevance and
compliance with subreddit rules
also had reasonably high importance scores. Statistical analyses
showed that the importance of these influences decreased slightly
with age, and that women and participants with longer reddit
membership durations gave higher scores. These differences were small
but statistically significant. When writing about their voting
decisions, participants often mentioned whether or not comments were
relevant to the submission title.
With
regard to prosociality,
people tended to prefer content that was helpful and considerate of
others, with rudeness or aggressiveness often eliciting downvotes.
For example, a comment stating: “Don't ask for advice from reddit,
it's full of the most smug self righteous assholes this side of the
internet” was downvoted by 65% of participants, most of whom said
that it was unhelpful or rude. This is unsurprising, given that
prosocial norms are almost universal and vital across different
cultures. Numerous scientists have even suggested that people may be
biologically adapted to favour prosocial behaviour and to punish
violators.
For
unoriginality and Karma-whoring
as influences in downvotes, it was found that their importance
decreased slightly with age. The statistical analyses also indicated
that longer-serving redditors were most averse to these traits.
Average importance scores for each membership duration group are
shown below.
Empathy, agreement
and humour were quite important
with regard to upvotes, and women gave significantly higher
importance to this group of influences compared to men. The survey
contained another question asking participants about the extent to
which their voting is influenced by emotional reactions to content,
where women also gave higher scores. Both differences are displayed
in the chart below.
In
the written vote explanations, participants often commented on their
emotional reactions as reasons for upvoting emotive comments.
Disagreement
was quite important in downvotes. The statistical procedure I used
showed that people didn't give consistent levels of importance to
agreement and disagreement (perhaps because downvoting in
disagreement is more frowned upon and varies depending on the
subreddits where one resides). Nonetheless, both agreement and
disagreement were common in the written vote explanations for
opinionated comments, as seen in the example below.
In
my thesis I suggested that the involvement of personal opinions in
upvotes and downvotes may reflect the human tendency to use rewards
and punishments to enforce our cultural norms. No matter how ignoble
it may seem on reddit, encouraging each other to hold similar beliefs
and to behave in accordance with shared standards probably helped our
ancestors to efficiently maintain complex institutions in trade,
education and marriages.
Social influence,
or the existing number of votes on a piece of content, was reported
as being mildly important in voting. Interestingly, the importance of
this influence decreased slightly with age, and younger people
reported taking more notice of content that is accompanied by high
numbers of votes and Gold badges.
That's
it for now. As usual with this kind of research, it's hard to know if
the findings are truly representative of the general voting behaviour
of redditors, but I hope that these results can be useful in some
way.
No comments:
Post a Comment